European Royal Families in WW2: Resistance, Exile, and Controversy
PHOTO BY ICHIGO121212 ON PIXABAY
World War II tested the resilience and relevance of Europe’s royal families. Some fled into exile, while others became powerful symbols of national resistance.
Their choices—whether to fight, flee, or cooperate—left lasting marks on their countries and their legacies. This story explores how royalty navigated war, occupation, and political upheaval during one of history’s darkest chapters.
Exile And Government-In-Exile Roles
Long before World War II, some royal families were already living in exile due to earlier conflicts. One example is Prince Philip, whose family fled Greece after its failed military campaign in Asia Minor following World War I.
As the following tweet notes, his father, Prince Andrew of Greece, commanded troops at the 1921 Battle of Sakarya. Their exile eventually led to Prince Philip settling in Britain:
This displacement would later shape his life and connect him to the British royal family during World War II.
Royal Resistance And Symbolism
Princess Elisabeth made history during World War II by joining the British Armed Forces. She was the first female royal to serve in active duty, taking on roles like truck driving and mechanical work.
As the post below notes, she became the last surviving head of state to have served in the war:
Her actions helped boost morale and showed a deep commitment to her country during its darkest hours.
Her service remains a powerful symbol of royal duty and national unity.
Controversy And Collaboration
Some royal figures faced lasting controversy for their actions during World War II. King Leopold III of Belgium drew criticism for surrendering to Nazi forces and staying in occupied Belgium.
The following explores his early leadership and the complex decisions that led to his post-war downfall. His choices sparked debates over loyalty, collaboration, and royal duty:
Such cases show how wartime decisions shaped both legacy and national trust.